Helpfull to achieving the CoMPAS project goal | Harmfull to achieving the CoMPAS project goal | |
---|---|---|
Internal to the CoMPAS community | Diverse community Multiple companies involved Multiple approaches Different technical backgrounds Governance Lots of knowledge Quick feedback 61850 norm development knowledge Reduce costs Influence 61850 implementations Allow to agree on software level Modern stack Clear vision of CoMPAS LF energy flag over CoMPAS control over the software | Different directions/priorities Risk of developing to fast (not enough eyes on the code) Do not thing new functionality enough true (change of not enough optimalisation) Technical architecture (some functions are double OpenSCD/SCT) Roadmap is not as clear Role of GE in CoMPAS Not enough time to collaborate in the same CoMPAS repositories (Alliander, RTE, Omicron) |
External to the CoMPAS community | Community growth Lower barrier to contribute SCD generation process promotion Ability to invest in CoMPAS/OpenSCD via 3th parties Higher demand of SCL configuration tools not such tool in the market Accarelate Knowledge sharing | Risk of losing companies Hard to find skills/experiance Compitition: propritiary software Open source perspective in the industry Vendors don't participate Overly complex topic: makes onboarding harder Clear and long-term stable financing/maintenance |
Manage space
Manage content
Integrations