Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

- 15:00 - 16:00 EST

Recording: here.

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Agenda (and slides)

\uD83D\uDDE3 CRESY - Colib.net - Sebastien Lepy and Lampros Papangelis

  • presented several actions that CRESYM launched

    • a web library open source, for power system component models and test cases to perform dynamic studies: colib.net

      • collect good enough different models (what kind?)

      • focussed on grid operators, but can also be academia and manufacturers

      • doesn’t see within LFenergy overlap yet, but with ESX (question), GPST (question) , better grids

      • bridge simulation tools of GPST, seamless connection with portal of GPST, colib.net is a tool in GPST portal (https://opentools.globalpst.org/ )

      • Goals: host a project in LFenergy, easy for users to access / find

        • investigate what is existing, merge etc.

        • develop governance

        • decide which services on top of this tool

        • populate the library with models

        • restructure colib.net to work with more models

\uD83D\uDDE3 Annual Review PowSyBl Sophie Frasnedo and Peter Mitri (RTE)
www.PowSyBl.org

  • start from 24:17 of meeting recording

  • presented overview, updates, (new) features, integrations with other tools

  • achieved criteria of growing the community / contributions

  • technical governance, steering community, best practice governance silver level

  • presented growth plan and help users with e.g. jupyter notebooks, new Julia binding

  • key achievements of last year (e.g. dynamic security API), new widget for jupyter notebooks

  • PowSyBl in LFE archimate

  • request for support / help (e.g. OSS logs in more languages, more feedback, keep processes practical and quality high of contributions, understand best practices score on lfenergy)

  • feedback on LFenergy: great help with e.g. promotion, organisation, badging keeps project clean and forces to be rigorous and clear list of criteria.

...

No formal vote is needed to stay in a stage. Formal votes happen in the TAC.

\uD83D\uDDE3 TenneT presention - ODINA - Jasper

ODINA specializes in fast linear network analysis. Speed is everything. DC loadflow is most important. Much uncertainty in dutch network, e.g. surrounding countries. Analyze billions of load-flows.

...

Organize brainstorming session around this?

✅ Action items

  •  Thomas van Dijk explore interest expressed by several to brainstorm on ODINA, Power Grid Model, Grid-Lab D, PowSyBl, CRESYM colib.net, OSS governance and possible synergies
  •  Sophie Frasnedo , could you check whether 87% can be specified between RTE core team and other people inside RTE. This might be interesting for TenneT.
  •  Is there a way @peter mitri and Sophie Frasnedo to find out how RTE (and bosses of Sophie/Peter) quantify benefits of OSS?
  •  David P. Chassin share with Sophie Frasnedo what they had to do for Gridlab-D early on in the project in the US, with unbalanced load flow
  •  Yarille Ortiz schedule meeting with PowSyBl for next year.
  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No decisions required